Accuracy, fairness, and corrections

Editorial Policy

Our standards for writing, reviewing, updating, and correcting assessment content across the platform.

AccuracyScientific claims should have support.
ClarityTechnical ideas should be explained plainly.
FairnessLanguage should consider diverse users.
CorrectionsErrors should be reviewed and fixed.

Editorial policy

How we keep assessment content responsible

Every piece of content on Intelligences Test should be accurate, clear, fair, and honest about its limits. That includes assessment questions, category pages, trust pages, result explanations, and research summaries.

The editorial goal is not to sound academic for its own sake. The goal is to make scientific ideas understandable without exaggerating what a test can prove.

Language standards

What we avoid and what we say instead

We say carefully

  • Research suggests…
  • Associated with…
  • People with this pattern tend to…
  • Educational or screening tool.

We avoid saying

  • Proven to…
  • Causes… for correlational data.
  • All people who score this are…
  • Clinically accurate without qualification.

Editorial pillars

The rules behind the writing

Accuracy

We prioritize peer-reviewed research and distinguish established evidence from contested or emerging ideas.

Scientific caution

We avoid overstating effect sizes, certainty, diagnostic meaning, or predictive power.

Clarity

We write in plain English, define technical terms, and use headings that make pages easy to scan.

Accessibility

Assessment explanations should be understandable to users without specialist training.

Fairness

We consider culture, language, gender, disability, neurodiversity, and access when reviewing wording.

Transparency

Commercial relationships, corrections, and important limitations should be clear to users.

Corrections

How updates and corrections work

When we discover or receive a credible report of an error, we review the claim, check sources, and update the content when needed.

If new research substantially changes how a topic should be explained, we revise the page instead of leaving outdated claims in place.

FAQ

Editorial policy questions

How do you decide what research to cite?

We prioritize peer-reviewed studies, especially meta-analyses, systematic reviews, validated instruments, and foundational research in the relevant domain.

How often is content reviewed?

Core trust pages are reviewed when platform standards change and when new research or corrections require updates.

Do you accept sponsored or paid content?

Editorial decisions should remain independent. If a partnership or sponsorship affects content, it should be disclosed clearly.

How can I report an error?

Use the contact page with the page URL, the claim, and the source or reasoning we should review.

Accuracy is a living process

Editorial policy connects the research, methodology, and user experience into one clear standard.

View Sources